Skip to content
Risk Management
PLANNED LOSS AT INVALIDATION+2R NOT A HEADLINELOCK R AT ENTRY

R as the Unit of Account

Dollars flatter or frighten depending on account size. Measuring wins and losses in R keeps the review honest and the size conversation separate from the ego conversation.

 Team · Jun 1, 2026 · 1 min read

A $400 loss on a $10,000 account and a $400 loss on a $250,000 account are not the same event. Talking in dollars mixes those events and invites the wrong emotions.

SCUTA standardizes on R: the planned loss at invalidation. The Expectancy Simulator speaks this language. The journal should too.

Clarity in the messy middle

When you move a stop, you change R after the fact unless you recompute. Pick a convention and keep it. Most students should lock R at entry and treat management as a separate grade.

Scaling without self-myth

If you raise the cash risk, you are not “more right.” You are choosing a larger unit. Scale Guard asks whether the distribution of R has earned that privilege.

A weekly scoreboard

Report the week as a list of R outcomes, not as a cash headline. The headline is for the ego. The list is for the work.

Questions we hear next

What is 1R in practice?

The dollars you agreed to lose if the idea is invalidated. A +2R winner is twice that unit, regardless of the cash number on a large account.

Should targets always be 2R?

No. Targets come from structure and from the playbook’s tested payoff. R is the ruler, not a commandment to stretch every trade.

How do commissions fit?

Include them in realized R. An idea that is +0.2R before costs can be negative after. The journal should use the number that hits the account.

Why not just use percent?

Percent of account and R are cousins if size is constant. R still helps when you compare trades with different stop distances.

Continue in this lane